Larry DiGennaro

Successful Partnerships

Posted on by

The idea of creating successful partnerships can be illusive, but it’s power to translate basic research into practical applications is fundamental.  It’s often hard to know the difference between a collaborator and competitor, so there is a natural hesitation to share information.  However, in today’s world of increasing complexity the necessity for partnerships is greater than it’s ever been.  There exists an overwhelming body of evidence that complex problems are rarely solved by one person’s “eureka moment.”  Steven Johnston illustrates this point eloquently in his book; The Invention of Air.  Johnston focuses on the 18th Century discovery by Joseph Priestly that the air we breathe is a combination of gases, primarily nitrogen and oxygen.  Many scholarly sources will credit Priestly with the discovery of oxygen, but the story is much more complex.  It’s true that Priestly was able to identify that there was an air purer than the air we breathe through a series of physical experiments in his laboratory in Leeds, but he inaccurately identified this air as dephlogisticated air and had a fundamental miss-understanding of the process he had discovered.  Luckily Priestly was well known as a frequenter of the English coffee house where he shared his ideas with a group called the Honest Whigs.  Steven Johnson contends that the English coffee house, and the culture created around it, fuelled what we come to call the Age of Enlightenment.  Priestly was a strong believer the concept of sharing knowledge to advance science, so when he explained his discovery to Antoine Lavoisier at a dinner conversation in 1771 he passed knowledge to a person with a much different skill-set.  This transfer of knowledge would eventually lead Lavoisier to more accurately name this substance Oxygen and discover the process we now know as oxidation.  Johnston writes:                                                                    

“Discovering that there was an air purer than pure air required qualitative analytical skills – an improvisational style – that Priestly possessed in abundance.  But defining the chemical composition of that air took a different toolkit, both mental and technological.”

The irony of this story according to Johnson is that by 1779 Ben Franklin, a fellow Honest Whig member, would negotiate to purchase 800 tons of French gunpowder for the struggling Continental Army.  This gunpowder was made with saltpeter directly from Lavoisier’s Laboratory which capitalized on the process of oxidation.  Johnson quotes Joe Jackson on the Battle of Yorktown:  “British solders complained that they could not get close enough to shoot colonials before they themselves were blasted from the garters.”  As architects we can  illustrate the importance of wide ranging functional space that supports collaboration, but the cultural mindset to share ideas must be encouraged at an institutional level and through actual stories of discovery rather than the eureka myth.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Cool, Innovative, Lab Planning, People, Science, Technology/Innovation

On Collaboration

Posted on by

We live in an amazingly connected world; a world where our ability to share ideas which will someday create great things far exceeds the wildest dreams of even the most creative minds of the previous generation.  A world that has been flattened by the internet has been connected by international travel and has been politically stable enough to build international relationships.  However, given the crisis mentality that seems to have gripped us and the profound and continuous change that this connectivity breeds you might be wondering if it is a good thing. 

You fear the internet might send your job to some far-away place.  You worry about the cost of filling your gas tank more than buying an international airline ticket.  You hear about the threats of terror somewhat regularly.  This constant connectivity can cause us to lose perspective and take a negative outlook about the state of the world in which we live.  Every now and then we have an experience that sharpens our perspective and reminds us of the great opportunities that exist in modern society. 

I recently read a fascinating book by Mandit Kumar:  Quantum: Einstein, Bohr, and the Great Debate about the Nature of Reality.  This is a book about the dawn of theoretical physics and the beginning of the atomic age.  It includes a twelve page timeline that starts in 1858 with the birth of Max Planck and ends in 2007 with the current puzzle of how pairs of non-local photons can behave predictably over long distances.  You might wonder what it could possibly have to do with politics, international collaboration and the building of relationships. 

The main plot of the story was not the part of the book that sharpened my perspective.  The fascinating sub-plot of the book that should be of interest to anybody trying to solve a problem that requires teamwork, was the story of the relationships between the dozen characters that led the focus of scientific discovery.  Nine pages of this twelve page saga occurred between 1900 and 1945.  If you take the time to plough through the subject matter you will realize that the incredible advances chronicled in this relatively short period of time would have not been possible to unlock by one person.  Even a person with the legendary intellect of Albert Einstein cannot succeed without the constant challenge and prodding of ideas from his peers.  As you begin to understand how long-standing relationships, respect and social engagement between this diverse group of scientists, you see the engine that propelled discovery and understand the necessity and the value of teamwork. 

Compare the collaboration tools, access to travel and the social and political state of the world between 1900 and 1945 to what we have today.  If you think we live in difficult times consider the following:

·         Forget the internet they wrote letters and had them delivered days or weeks later by steam ship

·         Commercial air travel was not available so if they met for a conference it took a real commitment of time.

·         These events took place during two world wars and the protagonists of the story were on different political and social sides of the conflicts.

With all the advantages we have today I suggest the next time you feel inclined to find an excuse about why you can’t collaborate with a colleague to solve a problem you might want to get a little perspective, role up your sleeves and get busy.  

In a world focused on action and results here are three questions that you might want to consider every day:

1.    If I hit a dead end when trying to solve a problem, what do I do?  Have you built a support network of trusted collaborators that can help you break-through?

2.    What keeps me from opening up to the insights of others?

3.    What risk did I take yesterday?  What risk will I take tomorrow?

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Agility, Design, Futuristic, Generations, Innovative, People, Technology, Technology/Innovation, Trends

The value of skilled labor

Posted on by

 

I’m seeing increasing evidence that skilled labor and the people who produce it are growing in value to business owners. So even in an economy with a nearly 10% unemployment rate, why are these key employees in short supply?  The answer is simple, it’s because our idea that the value of labor is rooted in an industrial revolution era concept of the assembly line.  We tend to view all labor as a mindless task reserved to those who don’t have the mental capacity to do something else.  In a six sigma, just-in-time manufacturing world, labor has become anything but a mindless task.  We are increasing the need for both thinking and doing.  I predict that this phenomenon will eventually change our mindset about higher education. To advance in the new economy, we’ll need intelligent workers who can make informed decisions in the manufacturing process and the employers who are willing to pay a premium to get workers that can both think and do.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Generations, People, Services, Trends, Workplace

Voices from the most recent NIH Biocontainment Conference

Posted on by

I recently had the pleasure of attending a two day Lessons Learned Workshop at NIH related to Biomedical Research Facilities that have been built in the last several years. In today’s complex world we architects are trying, harder than ever it seems, to meet the needs of our client with each project, but today, our clients seem to have many voices. The beauty of this conference was that all of the competing voices were in one place and had a chance to express their perspective in an educational setting. In the project world it can be an extremely delicate balancing act to place the proper emphasis on the right voice.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Agility, Architecture, Change Management, Design, Generations, Innovative, Lab Planning, People, Science

Ideal places for work

Posted on by

Those of you that are cynical about what the future holds for this country most likely have a very different view than I.  You see I’m a 3rd generation member of the melting pot that makes this place great.  My grandfather Carmen Moronti came to the US in the late 1930’s in search of “streets paved with gold” with nothing but the shirt on his back.  He found the American dream and passed it on.  I plan to do the same. 

My Aunt just returned from our ancestral home on the Adriatic Coast of Italy and brought back these photographs of the home and town where my grandfather was born.  She tells me that his mother, also pictured here, kept his room for many years, but he was never to return.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in People

Tunneling through the Cost Barrier might provide better spaces for people

Posted on by

If you’ve been to a seminar on sustainable practices lately, you may have heard the popular concept that tunneling through cost barriers might provide better spaces for people. To my knowledge, the concept was popularized by Paul Hawkins, Amory Lovins, and L. Hunter Lovins in their book, Natural Capitalism, more than 10 years ago.

Graph from 'Natural Capitalism' by Paul Hawkins, Amory Lovins, and L. Hunter Lovins

So what does it mean? The simplest example that is often given is that of a residential house: you can buy better windows, more efficient insulation, and even take advantage of passive solar heating. With all of these improvements, you will eventually reach the point of diminishing returns when you are spending extra money to save energy on heating your home. The detour that now seems possible is that you can reach a point where you’ve so radically reduced the heating load that you can eliminate the furnace and its associated ductwork altogether.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: ,
Posted in Architecture, LEED, Science, Sustainability, Technology, Technology/Innovation

The Role of Archetypes in Building Design

Posted on by

We architects often have difficulty communicating with non-architects.  We seemed to have developed a language that only works among ourselves.  If we’d just let the rest of you in on the game I think we’d produce much better results.  I was recently in a meeting half-way around the world in Dhaka, Bangladesh where this idea was underscored for me.

This was a conference room full of engineers and business people, or so I thought.  The meeting was being conducted in English, but it was not the natural language for most of the people in the room.  I had become very animated in describing the (5) essential elements of the Parti (architecture speak for “the big idea”) when one person, who had previously been fairly quiet, stepped forward and made it clear he wanted to debate.  The very next thing he did was turn to the rest of the room and said:  “you guys just won’t understand”.  He proceeded to quiz me on the validity of my argument about the relationship of the essential elements of the plan in a manner that I could easily understand, but didn’t make a lot of sense to the rest of the room.  It turns out this guy was a construction manager educated in an American school of architecture.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Architecture, People

Irony at the Intersection of Expertise and Experience

Posted on by

I’ve spent the last 25 years of my life pursuing and designing laboratory projects near and far and honestly believe that I’ve reached the point in my career where I have a deep enough understanding of how they work to design them in such a way as to improve the results my clients achieve in the spaces I design. If I see a project that allows my team to apply and/or expand the expertise we’ve built I will most often pursue it aggressively.  During this same time period, just like you, I’ve had a unique set of life experiences which provide me the motivation to continue what’s become my life’s work.  I really love what I do which sometimes leads me to the false assumption that I can be successful with any project when I’ve got the right motivation.  I’ve recently had to pass on a project where my life experience said “go”, but my professional expertise said “no”.  I think I learned a lesson in the process.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in People

Evolution of Tools

Posted on by

Like it or not, the availability of tools we can use to alter our world is always affected by current events happening on the global stage.  I’ve been involved in the architectural profession since the mid-1980’s and the design of laboratory and process environments since 1989.  Yesterday, I saw a presentation made by one of our laboratory planners related to fumehood technology.  It got me thinking about why we use the tools we use, what events cause the tools to change and why the change takes so long to evolve.

Take the standard chemical fumehood.  For as long as I’ve designed laboratories it’s been the go-to tool to protect people from hazardous experiments.  Even though today they can look pretty high-tech and sophisticated, they were pretty much just a dumb box working on ancient principals of convection, just like the fireplace in your house, right up to the oil crisis of the 1970’s.  After the oil crisis of the 1970’s engineers got serious about the fluid dynamics involved in a fumehood and focused on a tool that would use less energy.  By the mid-1980’s these hoods had reached the mainstream and were marketed as “low flow’ hoods.  By the time I started designing labs the oil crisis of the 1970’s was a distant memory and I can distinctly remember being told by engineers and owner’s safety officers to never use them.  A fumehood should be designed to protect people from hazards, not to save money.  I honestly don’t think things would have changed were it not for events affecting the world stage.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags:
Posted in Lab Planning, People, Science, Technology, Technology/Innovation, Tools

Powerful Ideas and Values that Last

Posted on by

Simple but clear words and concepts are powerful tools to help groups of people achieve common goals. If an idea can’t be expressed in very simple, clear terms over long periods of time by a majority of the members of a particular culture it has little chance of being institutionalized. The only way for organizations to act in a coordinated fashion is for individual members to hear, adopt and repeat the ideas over long periods of time.  It takes time, patience and strong leadership for ideas to take hold, but once they do they can have a powerful and lasting effect.  If you question the concept consider the following example:

On a recent visit to one of our great land grant institutions I had an official describe with great passion their concept of Public/Private partnership.  He said:  “We see partnership with private industry to commercialize new technology as the next logical step in the mission of a land grant institution.”  The idea made logical sense to me, but I must admit that I don’t often spend a lot of time thinking about what land grant institutions should be doing with the public’s investment.  After the meeting I decided that perhaps I should have a better working understanding of what a land grant institution should be doing with public funds, so I decided to consult the font of information Wikipedia.  To my surprise the concept could be stated in a single simple sentence:

The mission Land Grant Institutions as set forth in the 1862 Act is to focus on the teaching of agriculture, science and engineering as a response to the industrial revolution and changing social class rather than higher education’s historic core of classical studies.

Yes, a 150 year old concept can transcend time and revolutions in technology beyond its authors wildest dreams.  It can be re-interpreted and adapted to remain at the core of an institutions culture.  In these uncertain days of stimulus spending, and dubious shovel ready projects, where we the public are concerned about the return we’re getting on the investment of our tax dollars I feel much better knowing that there are institutions that have a firm grip on their values and a strong commitment towards achieving their mission.

Posted in People